1. Defendant B Co., Ltd.:

(a) Attached Form 1, 2.2.0

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a foundation established on April 14, 200 for the purpose of providing scholarships and establishing and operating scholarship facilities. Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is an online news service provider as a private news agency established for the purpose of providing news. Defendant C and Defendant D are the former North Korea news service provider.

B. Defendant B’s news article 1) Defendant C purchased F’s title “H” in the Fer G column of Defendant B’s homepage as the site for the establishment of the Scholarship. In recent years, the J market published the article as shown in the attached Table 4 stating that the J market submitted to the Council by the Council the draft amendment of the Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of the Scholarship Foundation for the purpose of preventing the right to personnel and the right to operate the Scholarship Foundation. 2) Defendant C published the article as “L” under the title “L” in Defendant B’s Ker G column of the Defendant B’s website, despite that the initial bid price of the site for the establishment of the Scholarship was KRW 2.9.2 million, the Plaintiff purchased the site at the price of KRW 4.5 billion. In relation to the purchase of the site for the establishment of the scholarship accommodation, the article as described in the attached Table 5 stating that the relevant parties, such as the J market, such as the J market, exercised pressure at the Office of Education and the head of the District Office of Education.

3) Defendant D, as the title of “O” in Defendant B’s NW G page, did not have the Plaintiff’s member, neglected the procedures for the public hearing requested by the Office of Education, which is the supervisory authority, to promote scholarship deliberation. While disregarding the request for the implementation of the administrative procedures by the City Council, Defendant D, which neglected the relevant Ordinance, committed an investment and loan examination of the Province, and neglected the relevant Ordinance and illegally reappointed eight directors, and published an article as shown in the attached Table 6 stating that the land whose value falls short of the value of the development restriction zone was integrated into the development restriction zone and was purchased. (The grounds for recognition)