logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.10.19 2018나517
매매대금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was the owner of C Truck (hereinafter “instant truck”). Although the Defendant purchased the instant truck despite the completion of the ownership transfer registration on September 14, 2015, the Plaintiff did not pay KRW 22,00,000 out of the purchase price for the instant truck, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff is liable to pay the remainder of the purchase price and damages for delay.

The defendant asserts that since the plaintiff delegated D to sell the freight of this case, the defendant legally purchased the freight of this case from D delegated D with the right to sell the freight of this case and paid the purchase price in full, the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed.

2. On August 28, 2015, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged as comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, witness E and D’s testimony, i.e., the defendant purchased the instant cargo vehicle owned by the plaintiff through D through D and paid 26 million won in full to D, and on September 14, 2015, the transfer of ownership registration for the instant cargo vehicle was completed, and ii on June 21, 2016, Masan Branch Branch of Changwon District Court entrusted the Plaintiff to sell the instant cargo vehicle at KRW 26 million from the victim, and sold the instant cargo vehicle to the Defendant on August 28, 2015, 25, 2.5 million won, including the remainder of 2.5 million won, and 2.6 million won, 2.6 million won, 2.6 million won, and 2.6 million won, and 2.6 million won, 2.5 million won, and 26 million won, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

arrow