(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.08.13 2015고단1880

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.08.13 2015고단1880

공무집행방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2015, the Defendant, on May 30, 2015, entered the C District District of the Bupyeong-si Police Station located in Bupyeong-si as the payment of taxi fares between B and B, who is a taxi engineer.

From that time to 02:53 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) as the Defendant did not pay the taxi fee and returned home to Korea on the recommendation of the police officer, and was subject to a notification disposition of a free-of-car lane; and (b) as the Defendant was faced with disturbance within the said C district, the Defendant was urged the police officer, who was urged to “I am home because I am under the influence of alcohol,” to “I am under the objection to the issuance of a light crime so that I am under the influence of alcohol, I am under the direction of the police officer, who was urged to “I am under the influence of alcohol, I am under the influence of alcohol,” and assaulted the police officer D, who was urged to “I am under the influence of alcohol, I am under the influence of the police officer, and am under the influence of the said police officer, with his bat

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to global guard service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made against D and B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation, a report on work days in the C District, a report on internal investigation results, and a report on investigation results;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant’s confession of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the degree of assault in this case is not serious; (c) the Defendant has no criminal history to punish the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant appears to have reached an contingent crime under the influence of alcohol.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.03.26 2012고정4782

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.12.10 2015고정558

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.04.17 2013고단167

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.07.18 2014고단515

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.06.21 2019고단240