1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception of the partial dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The Metropolitan City Mayor of the 3th 12th am the "Mining Area" shall be the "Seoul Metropolitan City Mayor", and the 5th am the following five shall be the "756 persons".

7 Under the 7th page, the term "refensive zone" shall be added to "maintenance zone".

The 9th five executives shall appoint the partnership executives and appoint representatives "as to the appointment of the partnership executives". The term "as to the appointment of representatives" shall be replaced by "as to the appointment of representatives."

12. The 12th 12th 12th son shall be filled by the “convenor” as the “convenor.”

2. As such, the part of the plaintiff's claim for confirmation of invalidity of the approval disposition and the approval of modification among the lawsuits in this case is unlawful, and each of the remaining claims is dismissed without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.