logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.09.18 2013가단224704
구상금
Text

1. In the instant case, the part against Defendant Line Transport Co., Ltd. is as follows: (a) the compulsory adjustment decision of 2015s21688 is rendered on July 2, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”).

(2) A and B (B) China (hereinafter referred to as “victims”) are those who have worked as construction woods belonging to Geum River Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance-Related Business”) under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.

3) C) D Rano five tons Kaman (hereinafter referred to as “instant Gain”).

(1) The Defendant Line Transport Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Line Transport”) is the driver and the Defendant Line Transport Co., Ltd. is the driver.

A) The Defendant Federation of Korea Trucking Transport Services (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) is the owner of the instant truck.

(B) On November 29, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an automobile accident compensation insurance contract with respect to the instant Maritime Vehicle. (B) On November 14:40, 2010, at the site of the construction of warehouse of the F Company located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, there was a work of moving the instant Maritime Vehicle into a mobile-type vision and a concrete pole and making the instant Maritime Vehicle into a concrete pole.

On the other hand, the victims were engaged in the work to be installed in the iron bars by receiving the pole freculator, which is moved to the creculator on the string of the three-dimensional height (Amth six meters) set up in front of the steel bars. However, while the instant creculator moves to the creculator, it exceeded the mobile creculator where the creculator is going to the creculator, and caused the victims to fall down on the floor.

2) Accordingly, the respondent A suffered injury, such as an injury to the left-hand flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium B, flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium flasium f

C. The Plaintiff’s payment of industrial accident compensation insurance benefits is an occupational accident.

arrow