logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.03.11 2020가단218870
장애급여 등
Text

1. The defendant

A. 5% per annum from March 31, 2020 to March 11, 2021, to Plaintiff A, as well as from KRW 113,792,356, and its related thereto.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 9, 2013, while attending the Incheon F Middle School, Plaintiff A (E) was injured by the left knee in the iron knee and suffered from the injury of the front part of the knee, the knee, the left knee in the steel fele, the left part of the knee, the left part of the knee, the left part of the knee, the left part of the knee, the left part of the s

B. On December 4, 2017, Plaintiff A was diagnosed at G Hospital as knee-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-in kne-one kne-one kne-one kne-one kne-one kne-one kne-one kne-one kne-

(c)

Plaintiff

On August 20, 2018, A received a medical corporation after the operation at H, a medical corporation conducted a diagnosis of disability in the AMA type of "(5%) with the content that "at least 6.1m East opinion needs to be seen compared to the right side side side of the refund unit (0.6m of this outline)" and "at least 6.1m East opinion", "at least 5% of the three major sections of Egyri left a minor obstacle in the function of Section 1 of Egyri, and at least 15% of Egyri's three major sections of Egyri under the National Egypt."

(d)

As a result of the court’s physical appraisal commission to I of the appraisal, I respondeded that “The Malosts’ Madles’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’s Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ Madros’ 1/2 applied mutatis mutandis to 1/29% of the Madros’ Madros’s Madros’ Madros’ Madros’s Madros’

E. Under Article 15 of the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents (hereinafter “School Safety Act”), the Defendant is a corporation established to compensate students, teachers and staff, and participants in educational activities who have suffered damage to their lives and bodies due to school safety accidents in Incheon Metropolitan City.

F. Plaintiff B is the father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the mother of Plaintiff A.

[Grounds for Recognition] Uncontentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, and the result of response to physical appraisal entrusted to appraiser I, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The occurrence of liability for the payment of the mutual aid benefits.

arrow