1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From October 4, 1985, the Plaintiff worked in Hyundai Heavy Industries, Inc. on May 8, 2009, after suffering knee injuries from occupational accidents, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by half-monthly felburity on the right skne and half-month mar fever on the right skne, and the left skne on the left skne, and received medical care until March 8, 201.

B. On March 7, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant for disability benefits on the semi-monthly and semi-monthly fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral flu

C. On March 201, the Defendant: (a) determined that the Plaintiff’s right bridge fell under 110 degrees 110, and the Plaintiff’s disability grade 12 Grade 10 was determined as to the Plaintiff’s right bridge; (b) as to the left bridge, the Defendant fell under “a person who becomes unable to properly meet one of the three sections of one bridge”; and (c) determined the Plaintiff’s disability grade 8 Grade 7 as to the Plaintiff’s right bridge.

On July 15, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-determination of a disability grade with the Defendant. On October 18, 2013, the Defendant did not assign a disability grade to the right bridge on the ground that the Plaintiff’s right bridge’s knee-gnee-gnee-gnee-gnee-gel fails to meet the grade standards after measuring 130 degrees. On the other hand, as in the previous case, the Plaintiff’s disability grade was determined under class 8 to class 7, and the Plaintiff’s disability grade was adjusted from class 7 to class 87.

E. The Plaintiff filed a request for review to the Defendant, but was dismissed on May 29, 2014, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee filed a request for reexamination to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee, but was dismissed on July 18, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 7, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 4, 6, and 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne