logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.03.25 2020고정112
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 10:40 on May 24, 2019, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim D (man, name) who is an employee of the victim at the convenience store located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B, by Daa, “I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am, and

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the purport of "recognition of committing an act")

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning D;

1. A written petition;

1. A report on internal investigation into CCTV at the site of the incident;

1. Report of internal investigation (referring to the change of the receipt form) (including the accompanying statement of complaint);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to one CCTV CD;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. The main sentence of Article 56 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and the main sentence of Article 59-3 (1) of the Welfare of Disabled Persons Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order acknowledged that the defendant committed the same act as the criminal facts of the instant case. However, the defendant vindicateed to the effect that he did not commit indecent act by force on the ground that he did not have kisced by force on his kis, kis, kis, etc., even though the victim took kisck because kissc down on his kisc and carried out kiscssc

After hearing the statements of the victim in the court, it also stated to the effect that the victim's actions had inflicted pain on the victim. However, the victim in the investigation of the case and the trial process of this case saw the victim as having been approaching himself/herself, and again let him/her go in the court.

arrow