Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a business owner engaged in the supply business of children’s goods with the trade name “D” in Ansan-si building B, and the victim E (the victim, the age of 30) was an employee who had worked from October 18, 2017 to October 20, 2018 at the said place of business.
1. On August 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the entrance of the said D office, at around 16:00 to 17:00, the Defendant: (b) led the victim to force; (c) caused the victim to do so; (d) caused the victim to move her her her turb, so that the victim her body would be cut back; (d) continuously induced the victim; and (e) her kid the victim to her kid, her kid the victim; and (e) her kids the victim to her kid, and her kid, her knife the victim, “I am her to her mother, I am his her son, I am his her son, and I am going on a business trip.”
2. At around 16:00 to 17:00 on August 24, 2018, the Defendant made the victim enter the president’s office to the effect that the victim would speak for the development of goods, and discovered the victim who was in compliance with his/her business instructions on the books installed therein, and made him/her kick the victim’s hand to the victim’s hand, etc., and kick the victim’s hand to the victim, etc., and k to the victim’s k to the victim’s k to the victim’s k to the k to the victim’s k to the view.
Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act by force on the victim under the supervision of the defendant due to his work twice in total.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of witness E;
1. The police statement of E;
1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim has consistently and specifically stated the crime of this case in the investigative agency and this court as well as the situation before and after the crime of this case, and there is no unreasonable or contradictory part in the statement itself, and the victim seems to have any circumstance to make a false statement.