logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.12.04 2014고단1931
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On April 24, 2012, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective crime, a deadly weapon, etc.) in the Sungwon District Court's Sungnam branch on April 24, 201 and three years of suspended execution in

5.2. The judgment becomes final and conclusive and is currently under suspension of execution, and is the friendship of victims C (23 years of age, intellectual disability 2 level).

1. A violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective violence, deadly weapons, etc.) has several records of hospitalization at a mental hospital, etc. due to the existence of ordinary alcohol, and repeatedly reported 112 reports while the Defendant had repeatedly filed 112 reports while disregarding C’s intellectual disorder at any time upon drinking alcohol, at the Defendant’s residence of the same year, at around 08:30 on August 1, 2014, at around 08:30, and at around 103, C, at the Defendant’s residence of the same year;

1. On January 23, 2014, in order to request an interview with the head of the Gu on the background of the abortion as of January 23, 2014, the police officer of the E box sent to the site upon receipt of the Defendant’s 112 report, took the same attitude as “the victim F. G, police officer, and police officer I, who are the police officer of the E box called E box called “the head of F. R. and the children will knife the knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife, which is a dangerous object.”

2. The Defendant is a legal guardian who lives with the victim C and actually protects the victim.

On January 23, 2014, the victim suffered injuries, such as laverization and laverging, etc., due to an abortion, and was performed at a regular hospital on the 24th day of the same month, and was unable to take food, so in such a case, the defendant, who is a legal guardian, was obligated to protect the victim by providing the victim with adequate food, having him/her undergo medical treatment suitable for the symptoms of the victim, etc.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.

arrow