1. The Defendant’s decision on November 15, 2016 pertaining to the Plaintiff’s disability grade shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 22, 2014, the Plaintiff received a diagnosis of “malopic lethic lethal disease, disability part, or disease lethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethr

On November 17, 2014, the head of Gangseo-gu decided on November 17, 2014 to Grade 4 of the non-functional disability (hereinafter referred to as the "first disposition") on November 17, 2016, recognizing that the plaintiff is not functionally functionally functionally functionally functionally functionally functionally even though he/she could work to a certain degree of learning.

B. On October 25, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration with the Defendant, but the Defendant rendered a decision on November 15, 2016, on the ground that “In consideration of the fact that, on September 15, 2016, both sides of the Plaintiff are indicated as class 5 on the record of medical treatment, treatment progress, video materials, etc., it is not recognized to meet the rating standards to the extent that it falls under the grade standards, and it does not include obstacles due to documentary evidence in light of the standards for determining disability ratings” (hereinafter the instant disposition).

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection against the instant disposition with the Defendant, but the Defendant did not accept the objection on the ground that, on December 20, 2016, the Plaintiff stated that the Defendant was fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily on both sides of the instant disposition. However, the Plaintiff’s objection was not accepted on the ground that the Plaintiff stated that there was fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluorily fluoring on the medical record page in September 2016, and that the Plaintiff was hospitalized

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2 through 7, Eul evidence 1 to 3 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 ⑴ 주위적 주장 ㈎ 지체장애 판정은 도수근력검사를 통한 근력...