1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 12, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) was registered as a physically handicapped class 3 or physically disabled class 4; and (b) was anticipated to be subject to a trial on January 12, 2014, later than two years; (c) thus, on January 9, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for a disability registration with the Defendant on the same day after receiving a disability examination at the Ruscdong Hospital.

B. On February 7, 2014, according to the National Pension Service’s results of examination as follows, the Defendant determined both the prize and the non-grade function, and notified the Plaintiff thereof.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). As a result of the National Pension Service’s review, the functional disorder in the criteria for disability ratings is mainly a physical disorder due to damage to the number of trees or the terminal boundary, or a nearby land’s disease, etc., and the strength of the entire arms or legs is not higher than Grade 3, and the degree of disability in the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the body or bridge should be recognized as having been objectively able to be verified by an inspection dog, and as a result of a comprehensive examination of the treatment progress in the medical record area, the degree of disability in the upper part of the upper part of the body and the degree of disability in the medical record area is not recognized as being reduced to the extent that the degree of disability grade in the upper part of the upper part of the body and the status of the functional disorder is not recognized as being reduced to the degree that the degree of disability grade in the upper part of the medical record area falls under the standards for disability ratings, considering that it is possible to walk with the least degree of

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed an objection on February 18, 2014, and the Defendant, on March 17, 2014, rendered a decision not to grade all the parts of the instant land and the non-grade function according to the review result by the National Pension Service as follows, and notified the Plaintiff thereof.

As a result of the review on the basis of the existing data, it mainly appeals to the lower reduction of the lower reduction of the studio in October 2013 after the decision was made to Grade III on January 2012, 201, as a result of the review on the basis of the data submitted, and as a result of the MF functional assessment (MFT) in December 201;