logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.04.14 2015고단3334
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at Seoul Northern District Court and two years of suspended execution on October 30, 2015.

On August 20, 2015, around 12:10, the Defendant stated in the written indictment for bodily injury, such as the victim C (44 tax) who was confined in the same room located in Songpa-gu Seoul Sungdong detention center D, Seoul, about 20:31, and the Defendant’s face and head, and the victim’s face and head, who was confined in the same room, was spread out to the place used by the Defendant, in hand, on the ground that he/she was living outside the bridge. However, the Defendant stated in the written indictment for bodily injury, such as the victim’s face and head, the number of days of treatment, the number of days of treatment, and scambling, etc., the Defendant’s face and head, and the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’

B. A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Entry of a defendant in part in the protocol of second public trial;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A complaint;

1. Records of the judgment: The defendant's previous convictions and results of confirmation, and the text of the judgment [a] denies the fact that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as spathn, while recognizing that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as spathn;

The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., (i) the victim was under treatment because he was not good before the victim was assaulted by the defendant (the victim was under prescription on August 19, 2015, the day before the crime of this case), (ii) the victim did not make a statement about the infant on the day of the crime of this case; (iii) the victim was diagnosed only on the left-hand level; (iv) the victim made a statement that there was symptoms of scambling, etc. in the complaint prepared four days after the crime of this case (as of August 24, 2015, 2015), but the victim did not make a statement that scambling, etc. was broken; and (iv) the victim was under dental treatment on August 27, 2015.

arrow