A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle Cbea in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving).

On November 20, 2017, the Defendant, at around 18:20, driven the said car, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.218% in blood on the front of the petition-gu, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, the Defendant was driving the said car at a new bank distance to the Sung Hospital.

At all times, signal lights were installed on the front door, and the defendant was stopped along the signal signal atmosphere, so in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely operate the steering and steering gear by accurately operating the steering and steering gear.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant neglected to do so, the Defendant left the front part of the victim E (the 29-year-old driver) driving car, which was parked in the signal atmosphere from the back of the Defendant due to the negligent negligence, received the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle back to the rear part.

Ultimately, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was driving a motor vehicle in which normal driving is difficult, and the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as dump finites and tensions that require approximately two weeks medical treatment.

2. The Defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), driven Cbea car while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.218% in blood from the section of approximately 800 meters from the front of the apartment apartment in the Gu Office G at Cheongju-si to the front of the same Gu D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A response to the request for appraisal (the defendant and his defense counsel stated minor shock of the collision of this case and thus the injury to the victim cannot be recognized;

“To the effect that “” is asserted.

However, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court is as follows.