A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The defendant has been punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million on January 4, 201, a fine of KRW 1.5 million on April 21, 201, and a fine of KRW 2 million on April 21, 201, as a crime of violation of Road Traffic Act in Ansan Branch of the Suwon District Court.

1. A person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions, and the Defendant driven a C fright vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.218% alcohol concentration 0.218% at the 1km section from the 20:18 Sinri-dong, Sinung-dong, Sinri-dong, Sinri-si, Sinri-si, Sinri-si, Seoul-si, Seoul-do, to the front road of B. Sinri-si.

2. On November 19, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused before the risk) was drunk and 0.218% of alcohol concentration in the blood transfusion on the condition that it is difficult for the Defendant to drive under normal conditions, such as a large amount of smell and face with red, and led to a speed of about 30-40km in the front of B in front of the Singu Park at the speed of about two lanes in the direction of the Singu Park at the speed of about 30-40km in the direction of the Singu Park.

A driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering wheel and steering the steering wheel and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and negligently driven by the victim D, who was under the influence of driving due to the negligence of driving in the atmosphere of marina signal, shocked the back part of the E-Wood vehicle into the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and shocked the back part of the G car siren vehicle driven by the victim F, who was under the influence of the above D, with the vehicle being pushed in the future, and was driven by the victim F, who was under the influence of the signal signal in front.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, driven a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the said D and F, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The survey report on the actual condition of traffic;