logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.02.25 2013고단2383
도박
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of 2,00,000 won, Defendant B and C of each fine of 1,50,000,000 won, and Defendant D of each fine of 70,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A and the Defendants: (a) from around 00:00 on July 8, 2013 to around 02:00 on the same day, each of the Defendant A’s house located in Jinanan-gun, and each of the first seven copies using the 52 card; and (b) Defendant A and the Defendants held a card with the same number three or more consecutive numbers of the same pattern or the same pattern of non-satis; and (c) in accordance with the agreed provisions, a person who held the card, such as to throwher the card if the sum of the number of the cards broken off or held by his hand is the largest in the manner of winning the card, the satis in order of the satis in the manner of giving approximately 20 times from KRW 1,00 to KRW 2,00 to the winners.

2. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D posted the card from around 04:00 to around 09:00 on July 8, 2013 to around 09:00 on the same day between Defendant A’s house located in the Jinanan ArmyF, with 52 cards used for the first four cards and exchanged the cards over three times in order, and then carried out a distribution in the last printing order, and then, among the remaining cards, the remaining cards, the card was carried out by a person with a low pattern or number of card, with a total amount of KRW 4780,00 per time in the manner that he/she gets paid money from 1,00 to 20,000 and KRW 40 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police and prosecutor's office concerning G;

1. Statement and image of the police seizure record, list and photographs attached thereto;

1. Entry of criminal papers, investigation reports, and accompanying field photographs, and the application of video Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 246(1) of the applicable criminal law regarding criminal facts, Article 246 of the choice of punishment, and Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act reflects in depth the mistake when the Defendants confession all the crimes of this case, and Defendant A, B, and C do not have the same criminal records exceeding the fine, and Defendant D has

arrow