Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, between two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants of the 2015 Highest 1797(the Defendants) are the relatives of the Gu.

The Defendants, as they could not receive a loan normally from financial authorities, lending companies, etc., received documents such as identification cards necessary for the loan, resident registration certificates, etc. from those who write up a letter asking the loan on the Internet portal site, and consulted them as if they would receive the loan, and agreed to have them open a mobile phone with the loan and dispose of it after receiving the mobile phone transfer.

1. On September 24, 2015, the Defendants committing the crime against the Victim F and G are required to have a long-term delay in communications on the Internet Nene knowledge by the Victim F.

In this case, I have written what I would be able to grant a loan, “I will be able to grant a loan,” and “I will be able to do so.”

Around September 25, 2015, around September 14:00, 2015, a false statement was made that “A mobile phone opening a cell phone and lending KRW 20 million on the face of the week” was made to the victim G, who reported and contacted the comments as “H”) and his/her female female female,” and that “A mobile phone opening a cell phone and lending KRW 20 million on the face of the week.”

However, in fact, since the victims were well aware that they are those who are not able to receive a normal loan from financial institutions or loan companies, they did not have the intent or ability to provide a loan to the victims, and they were thought to dispose of them in the form of public machinery with cell phone devices from the victims or to dispose of them as largephones.

As seen above, the Defendants, by deceiving the victims, received two mobile phones (two mobile phones 62 mobile phones) opened on September 24, 2015 from the victim F in his/her own name on September 25, 2015. On September 25, 2015, the victim G obtained two mobile phones (51 popon ju, 51 mobile phones 61 mobile phones) opened in his/her own name, and two mobile phones (opon 61 mobile phones, 51 mobile phones 50,000 won) opened in his/her own name by the victim F, and acquired six mobile phones of 570,000 won, including two mobile phones opened in his/her name by the victim F.

2. Crimes against victims I;

(a) fraud;