The application for intervention by the independent party of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit incurred by the intervention of an independent party shall be.

In accordance with Article 79(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, an independent party interventions in a lawsuit as a party by asserting that all or part of the subject-matter of lawsuit is his own right, or a third party asserting that his right is infringed upon as a result of the lawsuit as the other party or both of the parties concerned. In the case of an independent party intervention application of this case, it is evident that it does not assert that all or part of the subject-matter of lawsuit in the case of obstruction of business (the judgment was rendered on September 23, 2020) of this Court, which filed an application for intervention, is his own right, or that the right is infringed upon as a result of the lawsuit.

The application for intervention by the independent party of this case is unlawful and cannot be corrected because it fails to meet the requirements for participation. Thus, it shall be dismissed without holding any pleadings pursuant to Article 219 of the Civil Procedure Act.