logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.28 2020나55468
위자료
Text

The application for intervention by the independent party of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit incurred by the intervention of an independent party shall be.

Reasons

In accordance with Article 79(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, an independent party interventions in a lawsuit as a party by asserting that all or part of the subject matter of lawsuit is his own right, or a third party asserting that his right is infringed upon as a result of the lawsuit as the other party or both of the parties as the other party. In the case of an independent party intervention application of this case, it is evident that all or part of the subject matter of lawsuit of consolation money case 2019Na29074 (the judgment was rendered on September 23, 2020) of this court that filed an application for intervention is his own right, or that the right is infringed upon as a result of the lawsuit in this case.

The application for intervention by the independent party of this case is unlawful and cannot be corrected because it fails to meet the requirements for participation. Thus, it shall be dismissed without holding any pleadings pursuant to Article 219 of the Civil Procedure Act.

arrow