logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.13 2017구합13479
큰돌고래 수입 불허가 처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On July 25, 2017, the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant application”) filed an application for permission for import of globally endangered species (hereinafter “instant application”) with the company running the business related to the display of marine organisms and the sudden shock in Seopopo City B, and the main contents thereof are as follows:

Claimant: Plaintiff’s relevant details of the living (hereinafter referred to as “the instant details”) - Ordinary name: Large Corroopus - Origin and place of production: Japan - The relevant Annex II: Viewing at exhibition, experience - specifications (specifications): Live (273 cm) - port of registry: port of port of destination, port of arrival - Busan (unit of unit): 1 US$ 45,000 - the expected date of import and entry: the Defendant, on September 27, 2017, issued a disposition of refusal of import of sunkenly endangered species (hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) on the following grounds:

Article 16 (1) of the Wildlife Protection and Management Act (hereinafter referred to as " Wildlife Protection Act") and Article 12 (1) [Attachment 1] of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act are inappropriate (hereinafter referred to as "reasons for Disposition 1") due to the remaining capture methods of "where the import or bringing in of organisms does not jeopardize the survival of species" (hereinafter referred to as "reasons for Disposition 2") according to the review opinions, so that C Association and D Association do not introduce the population captured in different areas to the membership company (hereinafter referred to as "reasons for Disposition 2"), the plaintiff's resolution that prevents the latter from introducing the population captured in different areas (hereinafter referred to as "reasons for Disposition 3"), compared to the other domestic satisfaction officers (hereinafter referred to as "reasons for Disposition 3"), the following reasons are as follows:

The rejection disposition of this case is rendered.

arrow