logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.10.31 2018고정412
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Text

1. The sentence of each sentence shall be suspended against the Defendants A, B, and D.

2. Defendant C is punished by a fine not exceeding 500.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants, as the members of the F church in Ansan-si, while G pastors, who are hired by the members as the pastors of the above church, are conducting the business of worship of the above church, but at the HG group, the victims I (the age of 49) designated the above church as the pastors of the above church, decided not to enter the above church.

Accordingly, at around 15:00 on March 19, 2018, the Defendants: (a) followed the victim I and his wife (the age of 47) into the above church without the consent of the members, and (b) led the victim I by hand; (c) Defendant B was pushed the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her his her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers hers her with his her her her hand; and (d) Defendant C committed assault by

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of a witness I, G and J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a photographic photo of the suspect;

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Punishment A, B, and D to be suspended: 500,000 won per fine; and

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Conversion 1,00,000 per day);

1. Defendant A, B, and D of a suspended sentence: Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant C of the provisional payment order: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have any criminal power beyond a fine; Defendant B and D do not have any criminal power; Defendant B and D are the primary offenders who have no criminal power; Defendant B and D illegally proceed with the procedure of ex officio dispatch and causing conflicts with the members; and Defendants’ act does not constitute self-defense or legitimate act; however, the circumstances leading up to the crime are sufficiently taken into account.

arrow