beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' respective claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiffs are employees of public institutions that moved to the Seopo Innovation City in accordance with the government’s relocation policies to local government. The Defendant is a public corporation that supplies the F block public rental apartment as a public corporation that conducts the construction, supply, and management of housing.
B. On May 25, 2012, the Defendant issued a public notice of invitation of invitation of invitation (hereinafter “instant public notice”) on a public rental apartment of the F block (it is an apartment converted for sale after the ten-year lease), and the content related to the instant public notice is as follows.
Persons who are engaged in relocating public agencies shall not be eligible for special supply of houses (excluding those who own houses in Jeju-do and Jeju-do), but they shall be supplied preferentially to homeless persons at the time of application for public lease - because the schedule of application is different from the schedule of application by priority (1 to 3): Persons who belong to the household (all household members) who own the house of the household or household of the household of the household of the household of the head of the household of the household of the household of the first priority after confirmation of the schedule of application - the special supply of the employees of the agency and the installation agency - as of the date of application announcement of application (25 May 2012) pursuant to Article 19-5 of the Rules on Housing Supply as of the date of the date of application announcement of application (25 May 2012) and the Act on the Special Operation of Housing Supply for Persons, etc. of the Local Relocation Public Agencies, who are verified to be eligible for special supply of the house (excluding those who own the house in Jeju-do): Persons who are eligible for special supply of the apartment of the first priority.
Each of the lease agreements entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendant is "each of the above cases."