beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around August 16, 2012, the Defendant submitted a written complaint to the Dobong Police Station civil petition, Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that D would issue a promissory note with a face value of KRW 100 million at the face value and seek for the victims of D to be subject to criminal punishment. Based on D’s reasoning, around November 19, 201, the Defendant applied to the Seoul Western District Court for a payment order of KRW 100 million against A and applied for a payment order against D, but the intent was not achieved, and thus punished for attempted crimes because A did not raise an objection. However, the above promissory note was issued in order to secure the payment of KRW 100 million borrowed from D around November 201.
Nevertheless, the defendant submitted a false complaint and rejected D.
2. On November 201, 201, the Defendant forged private documents: “All the Seoul Jongno-gu E-1, 2-5 stories and 2-5 stories” without authority for the purpose of exercising a lease contract at a non-permanent site (hereinafter “Lease contract”); “Seoul Jongno-gu E-1, 2-5 stories”; “200,000 won in the rent column; “The rent column” on May 26, 2000 to May 26, 200 to May 26, 200 to 202 (2 years); but, on the other hand, the ownership registration of the building is registered in the name of the lessor under the name of the actual owner of the building “A” and “A” entirely performs the lessor’s duty as the lessor’s owner; “A” on the leased document under the name of the landowner, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-dong Gra 303, Dongdaemun-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Seoul, with his/her name and duties affixed his/her seal in advance.
3. On November 28, 201, the Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation documents, at around 14:00, the public service center of the Seoul Seo-dong Seoul Western District Court, Mapo-gu Seoul District Court, and at the public service center of the Seoul Seo-dong Seoul District Court, concluded a forged rental contract with an employee’s