logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.05.08 2013고단1999
부정수표단속법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 30, 2008, the Defendant entered into a check contract with a main office of a national bank and made a transaction of the check number.

On February 1, 2013, the Defendant issued two copies of the number of shares of each bank in the name of each Defendant, which is named as “E”, “E”, “30 million won”, “F”, “F”, “F”, “F”, “F”, “F”, and “F” in the indictment, in the office of the Defendant’s management D office located in the third floor of the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Seoul. On February 1, 2013, 2013.

The Defendant presented each of the above checks to the National Bank on August 1, 2013 and August 6, 2013, which was within the time limit for the presentation of payment, to the National Bank, but did not receive the same as the suspension of transaction.

On February 26, 2012, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “G”, “3,580,000 won”, “3,580,000 won”, and “date of issuance” in the above office, and issued one copy of the check number “H”, “10,000,000 won”, and “date of issuance” in the above office on February 25, 2013.

The Defendant presented each of the above checks to the National Bank on July 1, 2013, which was within the time limit for the presentation of payment, to the National Bank, but did not pay the said checks due to the shortage of deposit.

On May 3, 2013, the Defendant issued one check number I and 68 million won per bank in the name of the Defendant as the date of issuance of the check number I and 68 million won at the above office on September 6, 2013, and issued one check number J and 4 million won at the above office on May 6, 2013.

The Defendant presented each of the above checks to the National Bank on September 6, 2013 and October 8, 2013, which was within the time limit for the presentation of payment, to the National Bank, but did not receive the same as the suspension of transaction.

The defendant of "2014 Highest 351" is above June 17, 2013.

arrow