1. The punishment of the accused shall be one year;

2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidents after Accidents) by the Defendant is a person driving a Cpote car.

On May 2, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 16:10, and proceeded along the front distance of the public health clinic, which is located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si, with one-lane from the shooting distance room of the police station to the one-lane shooting distance. After changing the vehicle to the two-lane, the Defendant changed the vehicle to the two-lane, and then re-on the internship at a speed of 10 to 20km.

There is a duty of care to refrain from driving a motor vehicle because it is a U.S. prohibited zone.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and stopped 4,837 won at the repair cost, such as the exchange of the front driver, while leaving the taxi in the middle of the two lanes, and leaving the front driver of the E rocketing taxi owned by the victim D company, which was in the normal course at the top of the two lanes, and leaving the taxi to move back without taking necessary measures.

2. The Defendant, following the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”), was driving a car at the date and time, place, and place, resulting in a traffic accident, and subsequently driving the car at the seat of the police station in the long range from the surface of the next natural distance flood.

There is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, so the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the traffic of the motor vehicle that is driven by the center line in the opposite lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and received the part on the left side of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle by driving the Victim F ( South, 33 years old) driving while going on the opposite lane. The Defendant received the part on the left side of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant’s occupational negligence to the victim F is about two weeks’ medical treatment.