1. On June 13, 2013, the National Labor Relations Commission rendered relief from unfair labor practices between the Plaintiff and the Defendant joining the Defendant.

1. The circumstances leading to the decision on reexamination of this case

A. The Plaintiff is a company that employs 26 regular workers and engages in bus passenger transportation business, etc.

An intervenor is a regional trade union established on June 1, 2001.

Plaintiff

In the Company, the Intervenor Labor Union Taegu Transportation Branch (hereinafter referred to as the “Seong Transportation Branch”) was established on December 31, 201, and was approved by the Intervenor as the part of the Intervenor.

B. On January 3, 2013, A members of the Thai Transportation Branch: (a) on January 3, 2013; (b) on January 4, 2013, cooperative members B, C, and G, cooperative members D, E, and F (hereinafter referred to as “instant cooperative members”) submitted a trade union withdrawal report to the intervenors on January 5, 2013.

C. On January 10, 2013, the Intervenor filed an application for remedy by asserting that the Plaintiff’s act of having the instant members submit a written withdrawal from a trade union constituted unfair labor practices, but the Gangwon Regional Labor Relations Commission dismissed the application for remedy on March 6, 2013.

The Intervenor dissatisfied with the Intervenor and filed an application for reexamination with the National Labor Relations Commission on April 3, 2013. On June 13, 2013, the National Labor Relations Commission accepted the Intervenor’s application for reexamination on the ground that the Plaintiff forced the Plaintiff to withdraw from the trade union on the ground that “the Plaintiff’s act constitutes unfair labor practices as a control and intervention in the organization and operation of the Intervenor,” and the Labor Relations Commission accepted the Intervenor’s application for reexamination on June 13, 2013, on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s withdrawal from the trade union was forced to one of the instant union members G from January 4, 2013, and H made personal information with respect to the withdrawal of the instant union members after giving advice and written withdrawals, and that the instant union members collectively submitted written withdrawal from the trade union without obvious reasons.”

The plaintiff's cancellation of the judgment stated in this subsection and coercions the members of this case to withdraw from the trade union.