1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

On November 2016, the plaintiff is a national trade union with approximately 170,000 members, which is established to organize workers engaged in social service business, such as railroads, subways, aviation, buses, etc. and public institutions, public research, social welfare, building facility management, etc., and a higher organization is a D organization.

On April 21, 2017, the Plaintiff established the E-non-regular branch in the Intervenor, and approximately 200 workers belonging to the Intervenor were admitted.

An intervenor is established on October 29, 1990 and employs approximately 2,00 full-time workers, and runs the temporary agency business, tele-market, consulting business, and air transportation incidental business at around 100 nationwide places of business.

On November 19, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for remedy with the Incheon Regional Labor Relations Commission for unfair labor practices by asserting that “the intervenor paid incentives to workers other than the Plaintiff’s union members, and the conduct of compulsory leave, labor-management speech, personality mother, discriminatory treatment, withdrawal from a trade union, etc. are disadvantageous treatment, and unfair labor practices such as unfair labor practices of entry into and exit from the trade union.”

On January 28, 2018, the Incheon Regional Labor Relations Commission recognized the payment of encouragement and the withdrawal of trade unions among the plaintiff's application for remedy on the ground that "the payment of incentives by the intervenor and the withdrawal of trade unions constitute unfair labor practices, but it does not constitute unfair labor practices on the ground that the compulsory holiday is changed, anti-labor union speech, personality mother, and discriminatory treatment is not recognized or is not recognized as an intention to engage in unfair labor practices," and dismissed the remainder of the application for remedy.

On March 12, 2019, the intervenor appealed and applied for reexamination to the National Labor Relations Commission on March 12, 2019.

On June 5, 2019, the National Labor Relations Commission's act of the intervenor's payment of encouragement money to workers is justified, so it is difficult to view it as an unfair labor practice at a disadvantage. The main contents of the notice of encouragement payment are the payment of encouragement money.