beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for three months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine shall not be paid.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. On August 22, 2015, Defendant B, while smoking on the front of the “F cafeteria” road in Ansan-si, Ma-gu, Ansan-si, Annsan-si, the Defendant: (a) was sprinking for the victim A’s face to smoke tobacco; (b) the Defendant, by hand, sustained the victim’s humf and breast at one time and several faces of the victim’s face by drinking the victim’s humf; and (c) the victim’s humf was flaf and the victim’s humf was flafed.
2. Defendant A, at the same time and time as set forth in paragraph (1), suffered injury to the victim, i.e., taking the victim’s face into drinking by setting up against violence set forth in paragraph (1) and taking the victim’s face into consideration, such as an internal breatha, in need of medical treatment for about three weeks.
Summary of Evidence
1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each legal statement in witness A, B and G;
1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants
1. Each written statement prepared by the Defendants
1. A photo of the damaged part;
1. The defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that the above defendant's act constitutes excessive defense, such as political party defense or night, and the defendant B and his defense counsel did not have any fact when the above defendant was committed, and even if they were handn, the act constitutes legitimate defense, and thus the defendant should be pronounced not guilty.
A. The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i.e., (i) the victim A consistently sought from the investigative agency to this court, and (ii) the Defendant B had the victim himself/herself, on a consistent basis with the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence.
Defendant B also stated to the effect that the victim’s act of defense, such as extension of area, etc., by setting up against the victim’s assault, could have suffered bodily injury in the process, and ③ the victim A taken immediately after the fighting in the ruling.