logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011. 02. 24. 선고 2010두23651 판결
(심리불속행) 안분계산은 토지와 토지가 일괄양도된 경우에도 적용됨[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2010Nu5563 ( October 01, 2010)

Title

(D) The method of calculation shall apply to the case where the land and the land are transferred collectively.

Summary

(C) If the value of the land, building, etc. is unclear, the value of the land, building, etc. will also be applied in cases where the value between the

Cases

2010Du23651 Revocation of disposition of imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

육〇〇

Defendant-Appellee

〇〇세무서장

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2010Nu5563 Decided October 1, 2010

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Although all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of trial without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissal of final appeal by judgment without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see this case, e.g.,

arrow