logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.20 2014가단5206474
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The following facts and relevant medical terms are acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties, or in full view of the overall purport of the arguments, as a result of the response to the medical records by this Court to the Central University Hospital Gap and the results of the response to the medical records by this Court to the Giman National University Hospital.

A. On October 25, 2011, Plaintiff A received a hirstosis surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”) from the Defendant to treat birrosis in a F Hospital where the Defendant had worked as the head of the urinology (hereinafter “F Hospital”).

Plaintiff

B, C, and D are children of Plaintiff A.

B. The defendant is a doctor who performed the instant surgery.

C. After the instant surgery, Plaintiff A had the symptoms of dynamic circumstances. D.

The term " Leptirirosis operation" means an operation to treat a birreed repirrosis by removing a birrosis by using a cadmiumr. The term "septirrosis" means an operation to treat a birrosis by removing a non-birrosis, and the term "sirrosis situation" means a man's birrosis force is incomplete or the outside birrosis birrosis is excessively prolonged, and the birrosis is not discharged externally through an external b

2. At the time of the instant surgery, at the time of the Plaintiff’s assertion summary, the Plaintiff A had shown symptoms of pre-cover operation through pharmacologic treatment in another hospital.

However, the Defendant performed the instant surgery, which is not a pharmacologic treatment to Plaintiff A, but a large merger certificate, and caused symptoms, such as infertility, etc. to the Plaintiff due to the dynamic reason.

In addition, the Defendant did not provide sufficient explanation to the Plaintiff A on the merger certificate (e.g., dynamic conditions, infertility) of the instant surgery before the instant surgery.

Therefore, the defendant is liable for the property damage and mental damage suffered by the plaintiff A and for the remaining mental damage suffered by the plaintiffs.

3. Determination

A. The defendant's negligence in relation to the instant surgery is one medical treatment method.

arrow