logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.05.29 2014고정621
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu.

A person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall not make a false indication of the place of origin or make an indication likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, on December 2013, the Defendant: (a) provided a restaurant to the customers who found a restaurant by receiving 1 glux of rice 20 glux of the U.S. rice 20 glux of rice from Blux of Blux of Blux of Blux of Blux of Blux of B

Accordingly, the Defendant, after cooking the rice in the United States of America, sold the country of origin with a false indication as a domestic product.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. E-certification;

1. Application of each statute to the details of detection and photographs;

1. Article 15 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant does not have the same criminal record, confession and reflect in depth.

In addition, it seems that there is no significant profit from crime.

In this context, the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime are considered, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.

arrow