logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2015.04.22 2014누22687
하수도 원인자부담금 부과처분 취소청구 및 부당이득금반환청구의 소
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants against the Plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendants.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the case, is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the “10 cubic meters/day” as “10 cubic meters/day” is deemed to be “10 cubic meters/day.” Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

(1) The court of first instance has consistently repeated arguments in the court of first instance. In conclusion, the court of first instance is justified even if the defendants' arguments and grounds for partial supplementation were examined in the court of first instance. 2. Thus, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant South-Gu are accepted in its reasoning. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant Ulsan Metropolitan City are justified within the extent of the above recognition, and they are accepted within the extent of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and they are dismissed in its entirety on the grounds that the defendants' appeals are without merit.

arrow