beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 26, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the District Court for fraud, which became final and conclusive on May 7, 2013.
1. Fraud;
A. On April 1, 2013, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol to the victim at the “E” point operated by the victim D in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, A around 19:00 on April 1, 2013.
However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the victim received the alcohol and know-how due to the lack of money in the number of the defendants.
The defendant did not pay the price even though he was provided with an alcoholic beverage equivalent to the market price of 93,00 won by the victim.
B. On April 2, 2013, the Defendant ordered the victim’s alcohol and alcohol to the victim’s main point of “H” operated by the victim G in Sungnam-si F in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si on April 2, 2013, around 18:20.
However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the victim received the alcohol and know-how due to the lack of money in the number of the defendants.
The defendant did not pay the price, even though he was provided with alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 100,00 in the market price from the victim.
C. On April 3, 2013, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol to the victim on April 3, 2013 at the 'K operated by the Victim J in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, A around 02:50 on April 3, 2013.
However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the victim received the alcohol and know-how due to the lack of money in the number of the defendants.
The defendant did not pay the price even though he was provided with an alcoholic beverage with an amount equivalent to 66,00 won at the market price from the victim.
2. At around 02:50 on April 3, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s head knife, knife, knife, and knife, with the victim’s head knife, on the ground that the victim’s head knife demands the drinking value to himself/herself.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;