Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

The office of the Gangwon District Prosecutors' Office that has been seized.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On June 21, 201, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with prison labor for fraud in the territorial branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the original prison on July 11, 2012. On July 17, 2013, Defendant A appealed on July 23, 2013 after having been sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor in the first instance court in the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court as a fraud. On August 30, 2013, Defendant A appealed appealed on September 4, 2013 and appealed on September 2, 2013 from the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court as a fraud. Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor in each of the above cases, and was sentenced to one year and two years from July 23, 2014, and was still pending in the Supreme Court judgment.

In addition, on November 20, 2013, Defendant B sentenced Defendant B to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for night building intrusion, larceny, etc. at the Chuncheon District Court, and on February 5, 2014, Defendant B terminated the execution of the sentence.

【Criminal Facts】

"2014 Highest 242"- Defendant A

1. On November 2013, the Defendant sent a false advertisement to the effect that M will deliver electronic products to the Internet sites, such as D, D, D, and D, etc., and that M will be delivered to N by opening a bank account when the price for the products is deposited in the said account. M will take charge of the production of shopping mall for product sales fraud, investment and management, and N will deliver money received from the Defendant to M in sequence.

On January 2014, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that he sells television on the Internet “O”’s website at an online “switk site,” thereby making a telephone conversation with the victim P who contacted with the Defendant, and N made a false statement as if he/she would deliver television if he/she remitted the product price to the Defendant, in exchange for the letters of counseling with the said victim for purchase.

The Defendant received KRW 3,180,00 from the said victim’s agricultural account from the said victim.

However, fact is MM products.