logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.12.13 2018구합81608
징계조치처분취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff and E (hereinafter referred to as “victim students”) are students who were enrolled in the third year in the D Middle School (hereinafter referred to as “instant school”).

1. H, which had been viewed as the place of postponement of the victim’s disease broadcasted in the program of the F date KBS-1 TV “G, posted a photograph of the course to the group Kakaogle, “I,” and, on February 2, 198, a number of students who had been in the Kakaogle were informed of the fact that J sent the victim’s conversation to the victim by cutting down the conversation of “I” and sending it to the victim’s children.

4. At the time of December 12(d) and five intersections, she sought to the other party as an organization and for the purpose of resolving misunderstandings about the affairs during which she had been engaged in the said hours. However, the confirmation of the relationship was made by criticism or booming against the other party. On the side of the after-school parking lot, there were several students again at the same time, and thus, the victim’s threat is anticipated (hereinafter “instant Disposition 2”). On July 11, 2018, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence in the instant School (hereinafter “Autonomous Committee”) was held on the ground that the Plaintiff committed an act of school violence as listed in the following table (hereinafter “instant Disposition Grounds”), and the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to complete the pertinent educational resolution and notified the Plaintiff of the measure to be taken by each of the above measures pursuant to Article 17(1)3 and 5 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of the entire pleadings is based on the following reasons: (a) there is no dispute; (b) Gap evidence 1, 2, and Eul evidence 1 (which include each number; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (c) the purport of the entire pleadings.

arrow