logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.08.25 2015구합170
서면사과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, E, F, G, and H (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) are students who were enrolled in the first half of the year of D High School in 2014.

B. The Defendant conducted a survey on the actual state of school violence for the first year of the Jinju Police Station according to the cooperation letter by the Jinju Police Station, and confirmed the situation of bullying and bullying of the J (hereinafter “victims”) attending the same Ban by the Plaintiff et al., and held a meeting of the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence at High Schools (hereinafter “Autonomous Committee”) on August 28, 2014, deeming that the Plaintiff et al. exercised school violence to the victim students through the supplementary survey by the relevant teachers and the organization in charge of school violence.

C. On September 1, 2014, according to the deliberation and resolution by the autonomous committee, the Defendant took place on September 1, 2014, on the ground that “the Plaintiff, etc. was at least the appearance and horses of the same anti-student student from May 2014 to August 2014, and there were many cases where the Plaintiff, etc. went back and escaped, or scam back and scam back from the back and scam back the chair of the chair. He attempted to scam back the scams in the classroom and scam back the scams in the classroom, and divided the scams from the floor to the floor, and divided the scambling of the victim student and the scambling of the school violence prevention and countermeasures (hereinafter “school Violence Prevention Act”), pursuant to Article 17 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence,” the Plaintiff and G, and the scambling of the “special act and disposition against the student” and the “special act of education”.

The disposition of this case is "the disposition of this case" against the plaintiff.

(D) The Plaintiff, who is dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed an administrative appeal with the Gyeong-do Office of Education Administrative Appeals, but was dismissed on December 29, 2014.

arrow