1. The lawsuit between the Plaintiff and the Defendant C was concluded on January 24, 2019 by the final and conclusive decision of recommending reconciliation on January 24, 2019.

2...

1. The fact that this court rendered a judgment on a lawsuit between the plaintiff and the defendant C against the plaintiff and the defendant C on January 24, 2019 that the original copy of the ruling of recommending reconciliation was served on the plaintiff on January 25, 2019, and each of the above defendant on January 28, 2019, the plaintiff was served on the plaintiff on the original ruling of recommending reconciliation and did not raise an objection within two weeks, and the fact that the above defendant waived the right to raise an objection against the above ruling of recommending reconciliation on February 7, 2019 is apparent in the record.

Therefore, the lawsuit between the plaintiff and the defendant C is deemed to have been terminated on February 8, 2019 due to the confirmation of the decision of recommending reconciliation on January 24, 2019.

(1) The court below's decision on the recommendation of compromise as to the defendant C's ground of appeal pointing out that the above decision on the recommendation of compromise was made after the above decision on the recommendation of compromise became final and conclusive due to the waiver of the above defendant's right to raise an objection and, on the other hand, the above defendant filed an application for resumption of pleading with the law firm G, which was the legal representative of the lawsuit of this case, and there is no evidence or material to recognize

A. On July 27, 2009, the Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association that has obtained authorization to establish an association pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents from the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul office as a project area with the size of 94,245 square meters in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu as the project area.

3) The head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government shall publicly notify the Plaintiff of the authorization to implement the project on July 4, 2013, and authorization of the management and disposal plan on July 27, 2017 (hereinafter “instant authorization to implement the management and disposal plan”).

(B) On the following day: Defendant B, D, and F: (a) Defendant E: (b) the confession (Article 208(3)2 and the main sentence of Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act); (c) the absence of dispute; (d) Party A’s 1, 2, 3, and evidence Nos. 4-1 through 4; and (e) the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. Determination on the grounds of claim 1 sets forth the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents.