Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Gangnam branch court of the Chuncheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 19, 2016.

1. On January 22, 2014, the Defendant, B, and C are gathered at the home page B located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant is paid KRW 1 million per one million per person when he/she receives false insurance as if he/she had caused a traffic accident.

The purpose of “the person who receives insurance proceeds by receiving the vehicle in front as if he received the vehicle after the snow sleep,” was to make a proposal to obtain insurance proceeds by deceiving the insurance company as if the false traffic accident was caused, and B and C accepted it.

The Defendant continued to call to the person in charge of insurance, Hyundai Commercial Reinsurance Co., Ltd., and called “B’s father E”, and received the cub car from G in front of the front, while getting off the snow way with the Defendant, B, and C’s seat on the F-Wed vehicle driven by his father E.

It made a false statement to the effect that it is ‘the insurance processing'.

However, the fact that the above E did not drive the vehicle, and there was no accident due to snow slicking.

The Defendant conspired with B and C in order to receive insurance money by deceiving a person in charge of insurance for the Hyundai Commercial Reinsurance Co., Ltd., but the above person in charge was found to have been false in the process of confirming the facts to the above E, and thus, attempted to receive insurance money.

2. On April 1, 2014, Defendant B, and C gathered to B’s house located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and the Defendant again proposed to B and C a false traffic accident to the effect that “A person who received insurance money by filing a false report as if the traffic accident occurred due to the need for money,” and that “A defect as if the accident occurred directly at this time,” and that B and C obtained insurance money from an insurance company, as stated in paragraph (1).

Defendant B, B, and . continue to exist.