logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.04 2019가합521385
징계처분무효확인 등
Text

1. The part of Plaintiff A’s lawsuit and Plaintiff B’s primary claim shall be dismissed, respectively.

2. The plaintiff B is the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is an organization established with the aim of contributing to the improvement of public health and national health by promoting the development of beauty and art business and the promotion of friendship between the members and the improvement of technology pursuant to Article 32 of the Public Health Act, and its central association (hereinafter “central association”).

under its jurisdiction, the Do branch and sub-branch are affiliated with the Do branch, the Do branch are affiliated with the Do branch, and the Do branch is affiliated with the Do branch. The Do branch is affiliated with the G branch. The Do branch is affiliated with the Do branch.

(2) On June 24, 2010, the Plaintiff was issued with a unique number certificate as the representative of “B” at the seat of Seoul H building I, one of the Defendant’s branch offices.

B. On April 9, 2018, G Branch E, F, and Defendant Central Review Disciplinary Committee’s resolution on the expulsion from G Branch E, F, and Defendant Central Review Disciplinary Committee (hereinafter “Defendant Central Review Disciplinary Committee”) conducted a regular audit of G Branch E, and F, around April 2018, before the general meeting of the G Branch. During the above audit process, the E and F pointed out that Plaintiff A arbitrarily used the money that Plaintiff A received from its members as tax equipment, paid sanitary education expenses as employee’s allowance, and continued to work for the employee whose age limit under the personnel regulations, and requested the Plaintiff and the Secretary General to provide and correct relevant data. However, Plaintiff A and F requested Plaintiff A and the Secretary General to provide and correct the relevant data, but the Plaintiff failed to comply with the request for a special audit of the G Branch on May 9, 2018.

On May 15, 2018, G Branch passed a resolution to dismiss the above auditors from the audit at the ordinary meeting held on May 15, 2018.

In addition, on June 19, 2018, the G Branch held the first Disciplinary Committee and passed a resolution on a disciplinary action against E, F and adviser D at the G Branch (hereinafter “instant expulsion disposition”).

3 E is reviewed on July 4, 2018, F, and D on July 5, 2018, respectively, to the Central Review Disciplinary Committee of the Defendant.

arrow