A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfering with his/her business from around 05:0 on September 5, 2018 to 05:13, 2018, at “D” operated by the victim C located in Si interesting City B, without any reason under the influence of alcohol, brea the victim’s bath, and the victim so requests.

In this regard, it interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force, such as cutting down the tables that were placed for business on the street, cutting down plastic chairs, assaulting the guest, etc.

2. On September 5, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim in line with the victim E (V, 25 years of age) by gathering plastic chairs, which are dangerous objects, at the places described in paragraph 1, around 05:13, around September 5, 2018.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 05:45 on September 5, 2018, and at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 05:45, and at the place indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant sent to the Defendant, upon receiving a report from 112, “D customers fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright

달라’ 라는 요청을 받고, 피고인의 업무 방해 행위를 제지하기 위해 피고인의 팔짱을 끼고 현장에서 15m 정도 걸어 나와 ‘ 하실 말씀 있으세요

“The right part of F’s f’s right part of the grandchildren was assaulted at one time.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. E statements;

1. On-site photographs andF damaged photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D Business Notes C’s oral hearing

1. Article 314 (1) (Interference with Business), Articles 261, 260 (1) (Special Violence), and 136 (1) (Interference with Execution of Public Duties) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (to choose to imprisonment with prison labor for each of the following categories);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendant has been convicted of three times of violence, including a suspended sentence, and the instant crime was not contingent and agreed with the victims.