logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.11.30 2018고단3923
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 3923]

1. On June 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) connected the victim B with “Internet Game” in the DPC room located in the Dong-gu Seoul-gu Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and (b) ordered the victim B to purchase game items and pay money to the victim B with the face value.

was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay game items to the victim.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) obtained a game item with an amount equivalent to KRW 300,000 at the market price on the same day from the victim; and (c) acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

[2018 Highest 4106]

2. The Defendant, around July 6, 2018, connected to the Internet game “former T&Mter” in the Southern-gu Seoul Southern-gu PC room around July 6, 2018, carried out as if the Victim E-friendly appearance of the victim, and wired money to the victim “if the cell phone is broken off at present and if it is substituted for the settlement of items, it will transfer money to the victim.

“.....”

However, as the defendant misrepresented the victim's friendship, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if the damaged person would settle the item.

피고 인은 위와 같이 피해자를 기망하여 이에 속은 피해 자로부터 시가 합계 19만 원 상당의 힙 합섬 머 패키지 아이템 6개를 넘겨받아 같은 금액 상당의 재산상 이익을 취득하였다.

[2018 Highest 4327]

3. The Defendant, at around 02:30 on June 18, 2018, connected the Internet game in the HPC located in Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gwangju, to “the former Lbbbter”. After approaching the victim F, the Defendant would offer money if he/she transferred an item by purchasing the item on behalf of the victim because he/she did not want to purchase the fab but would not be settlement.

“.....”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he receives game items from the damaged person.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above.

arrow