Of the first and second and third original judgments, all of the judgment of the defendant shall be reversed.

The defendant shall be sentenced to one year of imprisonment.

1. The sentencing of the original judgment on the summary of the grounds for appeal (the first judgment: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year, the second judgment: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year and 6 months and the third judgment: imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months) is too unreasonable.

2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant's ex officio judgment following the combination, the case of appeal by this court 2013No1005 of the first instance judgment concerning the defendant's part of the first instance judgment, the case of appeal by this court 2013No2415 of the second instance judgment, and the case of appeal by this court 2013No3130 of the third instance judgment, which is the case of appeal by this court 2013No2415 of the second instance judgment, were successively joined in the proceedings for the first instance. Each of the crimes of the defendant in the first instance judgment and the crimes in the second and third instance judgment, among the crimes in the first instance judgment, are concurrent crimes under Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and shall be sentenced to a single sentence within the term of punishment subject to aggravated punishment pursuant to Article 38 (1) of the Criminal Act. In this regard, the parts of the first instance judgment and the

3. If so, the part of the first and second and third judgment of the court below on the defendant's ground of reversal of authority above is reversed under Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing. It is so decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are as shown in each corresponding column of the judgment of the court below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the fact of fraud, and the addition of Article 30 of the Criminal Act to the crime committed on June 25, 2009 to the victim E), Article 111(1) of the Attorney-at-Law Act (the receipt of money and valuables under the pretext of trust);

1. As to the crime of fraud and the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act of May 2, 2009 against the victim BA of Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act, punishment is added.