1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 16, 2015, the Plaintiff was suffering from an abortion while working at the scene of the removal of Abababa in Seog Integrated Development Co., Ltd. in the Ababa.

On March 4, 2016, the Plaintiff concluded the medical care on the pressure table (closed) of the part 11 of the above accident, the left-hand alley, the alley of the Non-sturinal, and the sub-consumptive typosis of the sub-consumption.

B. On March 9, 2016, the Plaintiff was determined as Grade 7 of the disability No. 11 (the remaining inverte) (the remaining inverte).

C. On December 11, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-medical care benefits with the Defendant according to the intention of C Hospital doctors who need preservation treatment and progress observation, such as the control of Huuri, Alley, Madumumume, Madumume, and pain.

On December 13, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of the additional medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) according to a medical opinion that “The proof of apparent aggravation of symptoms is not confirmed compared to the time of completion of medical care, and the additional medical care for simple treatment and perjury is insufficient in accordance with the criteria for recognition.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. As to the Plaintiff’s assertion, ① continuous pains arise due to the disease symptoms higher than that occurred in 2015, as a result of the inspection, such as X-ray, CT, and MRI by medical specialists in the department of anesthesia anesthesia, etc.

In addition, it is stated that "the preservation and treatment of assistive devices, such as wearing assistive devices, was taken several times with respect to the chest pressure pressure table No. 11 in C Hospital Maternology and medical opinion, and it is required to observe the progress of the pain clinic treatment, the antiscopic antiscopic therapy and pain control as it continues so that it can be impossible for the daily life even at present."

Therefore, the plaintiff needs to be actively treated to cure the aggravation of the state of injury and disease, which was the subject of the medical care.