1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revoked part is revoked.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff in the process of diagnosis and surgery caused low symptoms of a sense of senscence from November 2007 to both sides. Since January 2008, the low fluscence and pains that were not caused by both sides have deteriorated.

On February 26, 2008, the Plaintiff first brought to C Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”) at the address, such as pain and pain without any bladroping, booming and low fluoring symptoms, the left-hand, so long as the Plaintiff has a sense of view on the left-hand side, walking disability, urology, and urine difficulties, etc.

As a result of the MRI examination of the defendant on February 28, 2008 against the plaintiff, the opinion that the defendant was accompanied by the verte invert 6-7 and central ebrate, protruding out, protruding out, protruding out, 5-6 in chronology, proton 8-9 accompanied by minor inverte chronological chronological chronology and pressure chronology, and the result of the examination of the 3rd computer chronic chronology (non-young) of the defendant on March 6, 2008, the chest 5-7 in chronological chronology, 11-12 in chronic chronological chronology, chronological chronty chronty chronty, chron chronty chronty flue chronty, chron chron 1-6 invertic chron chronological chron, and chron chromomomoty chosis.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff as the MaI, CT test results and clinicals No. 5-7, No. 11-12, the 11-12, and the chronology 2-6, and the chronology 1-5, No. 8-11, and 8-11, respectively.

On March 17, 2008, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital from around 08:15 to around 17:30 on March 19, 2008, and was conducted from the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital with a chest 6-7 Madern convergence and self-feling surgery (hereinafter referred to as “the first surgery”). The medical staff of the Defendant Hospital conducted the first surgery on the following symptoms: (a) there were symptoms, such as pain and raining math, which are serious to the Plaintiff immediately after the first operation; (b) on March 19, 2008, the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital inspected the first floor of the computer screen (non-permanent), and (c) on March 20:22, 2008, the doctor of the film department of the Defendant Hospital conducted the operation with a chest 7-8 Madromothosis.