logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.28 2013고합578 (1)
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around March 2003, a corporation established and operated in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, a corporation with its head office in the second floor, and acquired H with its head office in the G building 307 around August 2007 and has overall control over all the affairs such as the management and execution of the company's funds.

Defendant

B, from March 31, 2010 to March 31, 2010, work as an intra-company director of the above H, and is in charge of the management and execution of the above company's funds according to the orders of Defendant A.

around December 2011, 201, I Co., Ltd. and F Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., and F Co., Ltd., Ltd., ordered the "J projects" ordered by the Gwangju Government Integrated Computer Center.

Defendant

A and K conspired to offer bribe in favor of offering convenience in the process of carrying out the following year, along with cases of allowing L who is a supervisory public official to receive a project.

Defendant

A around December 201, at the above F Office, put three million won in an envelope, which was prepared in advance at the above F Office, and K received three million won in cash, and K inspected that “N” in Seo-gu, Gwangju, by inserting it in an envelope and auditing “N” in a mutual drinking house so that it can perform the business by drinking alcohol together, and made a solicitation for the progress of the following year.

K, after drinking alcohol, issued a bag containing 2 million won in cash to L who want to return to a taxi in front of the foregoing drinking house.

As a result, Defendant A offered a bribe in collusion with K in relation to L's duties as a public official.

"2015 Gohap123"

1. Defendants A and B’s breach of trust are related to professors selected or to be selected as members of the review evaluation committee directly or through O, P, etc., who are employees of the company in order to obtain good scores from the members of the review evaluation committee in ordering the Government Integrated Computer Center-related projects ordered by the Public Procurement Service.

arrow