logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.12.06 2017고단993
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for a term of six months for fraud in the support of the Jung-gu District Court, and on April 30, 2015, the sentence of the said suspension of execution was invalidated upon the final judgment on June 16, 2015. The parole period was expired on December 24, 2015 and on February 3, 2016, after the execution of each of the above sentence was released on parole on December 24, 2015.

Defendant D (E) around 01:30 on February 12, 2017, Defendant D (hereinafter “E amusement shop”) sent by Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around 01:0 on February 12, 2017, stated that the fact was that, despite being provided with alcohol, alcohol, and services, Defendant D (E) placed an order of alcohol, alcohol, and alcohol, ordering the payment of the price in a normal manner while engaging in the act as if he would pay the price in a normal manner.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) provided the victim with an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 160,000 in total from the market price; and (c) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of the said amount.

around 02:00 on May 14, 2017, Defendant 1794 took the same attitude as paying the amount to the victim to the victim under the “H point” operated by the victim G in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul.

However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay the price because there was no available card or cash.

The Defendant, as seen above, was informed of the victim’s deception and the total amount of KRW 125,00,000 from the victim’s injury.

On May 14, 2017, Defendant J. 2203 ordered L. 6 C. C., C., C. 1 C., S., S., S. and S., S. to pay the alcohol value to the victim despite having no intent or ability to pay the alcohol value even after drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant is the victim as above.

arrow