1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the following "the part amended by 2.0", and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The amended part of the judgment of the court of first instance, 2.6 pages 2, 6, and 4, each of the “Plaintiffs” to “A” (hereinafter “A”) and each of the “Plaintiffs” to “A”, respectively.

The following shall be added to four pages 4 of the first instance judgment:

“A. A. A was decided to commence the rehabilitation procedure on March 8, 2018, when the instant lawsuit was pending, by the Daegu District Court 2018 Ma109, and the Plaintiff, a representative director of A, was the custodian. After the trial, the Plaintiff became the assignee of the instant lawsuit pursuant to Article 244 of the Civil Procedure Act (Article 244 of the Civil Procedure Act) (hereinafter referred to as “A and the Plaintiff are collectively referred to as “Plaintiff”).

. The 6th written judgment of the first instance court is not 10 pages 6.

later, the following shall be added:

Although the Plaintiff asserts that [the Plaintiff is a lien holder and has the right to lawfully possess the instant underground parking lot, whether the Plaintiff has the right to claim a related construction cost with the instant underground parking lot, and accordingly whether there exists a legitimate right to possess the instant underground parking lot as the lien holder is irrelevant to the propriety of the instant claim (the legitimacy of the claim for recovery of possession is determined by whether the Plaintiff actually occupied the object at the time of the deprivation of possession, and the existence of this right does not affect). The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the above assertion is not separately determined.

[Attachment]

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.