1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the following modifications.

[Revision] The entry of “Plaintiff” in Part 7 of Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court as “A” (hereinafter “A”) and each “Plaintiff” in Part 2 as “A” respectively.

Part IV of the decision of the first instance court shall add the following:

A person shall be appointed.

G. On March 8, 2018, when the instant lawsuit was pending in the trial, A was decided to commence the rehabilitation procedure by the Daegu District Court 2018 Ma109, which was decided on March 8, 2018, and the Plaintiff was the manager.

Since then, the plaintiff taken over the lawsuit of this case.

(A) The following contents are added to the judgment of the first instance court No. 6 of the judgment of the first instance court No. 9 of “A and the Plaintiff (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiff”).” Whether the Plaintiff had a right to possess the instant underground parking lot, whether the Plaintiff actually occupied the instant underground parking lot, and whether the Plaintiff’s claim for the possession of the instant underground parking lot was reasonable. Furthermore, there is no relation to whether the Plaintiff’s claim for possession of the instant underground parking lot was reasonable.

Meanwhile, even according to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the possession of the entire building of this case, including the instant underground parking lot, is currently transferred to the Jinjin-si Frib Co., Ltd., and according to the overall purport of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 21 and 22 as well as the entire arguments, it is recognized that the provisional disposition was revoked and finalized in the trial after the provisional disposition was rendered against the Defendant Hanjin Heavy Industries.

According to this, the plaintiff's claim for the recovery of possession shall be the underground parking lot of this case.