logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.09.19 2014고정1362
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Embezzlements of lost possession;

A. On March 1, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the card, which was lost by the victim, on or around March 1, 2014, without following the prescribed procedures, such as acquiring a new card and returning it to the victim, in the vicinity of the area of the west-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B. On March 9, 2014, the Defendant, around March 9, 2014, embezzled the national card lost by the victim B, without following the prescribed procedures, such as acquiring the national card and returning it to the victim, etc. in the vicinity of the Myeongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

2. Fraud or violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. The Defendant committed on March 1, 2014. On March 1, 2014, around 06:27, the Defendant purchased a victim D operation E in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and purchased a tenant, etc., and then purchased a tenant, etc., and as if the Defendant was the lawful holder of the part of the employee’s name, the Defendant purchased the tenant, etc. under the pretext of settlement, the above Article

A new card, as stated in paragraph (1), was presented to the above employee to prepare a credit card sales slip, and the defendant illegally uses the above new card by signing and issuing the credit card sales slip on the member signature column, and exempted the payment of the above amount of 33,710 won for the above goods, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the same amount of money.

B. On March 9, 2014, the Defendant purchased the above E, tobacco, etc. on March 9, 2014, and purchased it on March 9, 2014, and as if he/she was an employee under the name of the employee under the pretext of settlement, the Defendant was a lawful holder.

A copy of the National Card that he/she acquired, as stated in paragraph (1), had the above employee prepare a credit card sales slip, and the defendant illegally uses the above national card and exempted the payment of the amount equivalent to 19,250 won of the above goods by signing and issuing the credit card sales slip on the member signature column.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written Statements of D. D.

arrow