A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant Co., Ltd., the Vice Director of Category C Bank:

D. In collusion with E and P, a “loan Broker” (one name F), the trading of I commercial building is approximately ten billion won since it was conducted as the deputy head of the bank in order to purchase and sell the I commercial building at the first place near the C Bank’s station located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu on March 2007, at the first place of the C Bank’s station located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to the victim H, and D as the deputy head of the bank in order to purchase the I commercial building.

At this time, due to the lack of all expenses such as appraisal costs necessary for loans, the buyer has difficulty in obtaining loans as security for the I commercial building and purchasing them.

In addition, if you lend 350 million won to 350 million won, you will use it as loan expenses, such as appraisal expenses, and make the loan implemented by promoting the work together with F who is the director in charge of the loan.

Since 20 days later, the buyer can get a senior loan to the I commercial building as security, and the loan will add 200 million won in return for the loan to the I commercial building as well as the principal amount of 350 million won to the I commercial building.

If you want to lend money, ‘J reconstruction apartment' currently held at the present time will be provided as security, and the principal will be repaid without mold regardless of whether or not the loan is executed, and F shows the document envelope, and F has completed the review of the loan documents.

In addition, the Defendant and E stated to the effect that “I commercial building was approved by the inside and the D Vice Minister was directly in charge of the work,” and that “I commercial building was confirmed by the buyer who wants to buy, and only I commercial building was confirmed by the bank loan, I would accept the building.”

However, even if the defendant et al. borrowed money from the damaged party, he did not intend to use it as loan expenses for commercial building such as appraisal expenses.